Seminar Notice Statistical Laboratory Iowa State University DATE AND TIME: Monday, September 15, 1997, 4:10 p.m. PLACE: 319 Snedecor Hall SPEAKER: Brad J. Bushman Department of Psychology Iowa State University TITLE: A Procedure for Combining Sample Standardized Mean Differences and Vote Counts to Estimate the Population Standardized Mean Difference in Fixed Effects Models ABSTRACT There are two general approaches to conducting a literature review: the narrative (or qualitative) approach and the meta-analytic (or quantitative) approach. In the traditional narrative review, the reviewer uses "mental algebra" to integrate the findings from a collection of studies, and summarizes the results in a narrative manner. In the meta-analytic review, the reviewer uses statistical procedures to integrate the findings from a collection of studi es, and summarizes the results using numerical effect-size estimates. Traditional narrative reviews are more likely than are meta-analytic reviews to depend on the subjective judgments, preferences, and biases of the reviewer. Missing effect-size estimates pose a difficult problem in meta-analysis. Conventional procedures for dealing with this problem include discarding studies with missing estimates and imputing single values for missing estimates (e.g., 0, mean). An alternative procedure, which combines effect-size estimates and vote-counts, is proposed for handling missing estimates. The combined estimator has several desirable features: (a) it uses all the information available from studies in a meta-analysis, (b) it is consistent, (c) it is more efficient than other estimators, (d) it has known variance, and (e) it gives weight to all studies proportional to the Fisher information they provide. The combined procedure is the method of choice in a meta-analysis when some studies do not provide enough information to compute effect-size estimates, but do provide information about the direction or statistical significance of results. COFFEE: 3:45 p.m., 104 Snedecor Hall